It might be worth noting at this point that there are two Fritz
Meissner(s) on this mailing list (and this thread).

I think Heinz's examples of terrible features are all related to late
additions to the language, where compromises had to be made in order
to fit in new features for which developers were clamouring, while
still maintaining the backwards compatability that an enterprise-ready
language like Java requires (although who exactly was asking for
varargs I'm not sure). Are there other languages where the compromises
have been better made?

Regards,
Fritz

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Mike Morris<mikro2nd@gmai...> wrote:
>
> Fritz Meissner wrote:
>> In that case I'd be fascinated to hear what isn't a terrible language ?
>
> Lisp
>
> --
> mike morris :: mikro2nd (at) gmail (dot) com
>
> http://mikro2nd.net/
> http://mikro2nd.net/blog/planb/
> http://mikro2nd.net/blog/mike/
>
> This email is [X]bloggable [ ]ask-first [ ]private
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CTJUG Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to CTJUG-Forum@goog...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to CTJUG-Forum-unsubscribe@goog...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CTJUG-Forum
For the ctjug home page see http://www.ctjug.org.za
For jobs see http://gamatamjobs.appspot.com/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---