opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

a : address-policy-wg@ripe.net 26 October 2011 • 3:03AM -0400

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
by Gert Doering

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




Hi,

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 07:06:05PM +0100, Remco Van Mook wrote:
> With some first hand experience in setting up Exchanges, I would suggest
> the following:
>
> - a new IXP gets a /24
> - an existing IXP that runs out of its /24 (whether from this /16 or
> another range) gets a /23 and has to return the old /24
> - an existing IXP that runs out of its /23 (whether from this /16 or
> another range) gets a /22 and has to return the old /23

I think this is all logical to people setting up exchanges - but indeed,
it might be useful to make this clear to people evaluating such a request,
quite likely having never worked at an IXP yet...

Andy, you're taking notes? :-)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279


Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.