On Sunday 13 April 2008 17:27, Jeff Kesselman wrote:
> Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 April 2008 15:31, Bob Lee wrote:
> >> You might consider running the operations in their own VMs. You
> >> can reuse them, let them die, and start new ones as necessary.
> > I can't just let servers die and walk away from a computation.
> If you don't have the memory to compute the result... what else *can*
> you do?
I simply must be able to report the condition, not fail to generate a
reply at all, which is what happens if you let the JVM die.