On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 03:13:41PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@infr...> wrote:
>
> > would do the same.
>
> But is much less obvious.  The LOOKUP_FOLLOW flag is the primary reason for
> this statement.  The rest are subordinate and would be wholly irrelevant if
> LOOKUP_FOLLOW was to be removed from the list.

Then keep the LOOKUP_FOLLOW semi-separate as in the original code.
But there's absolutely no reason for the goto spaghetti.

_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
autofs@linu...
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs