>>>> I was thinking about the API, like in
>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/guile.html#Initialization >>>> Actually, I was looking at the PDF, where it looks like:
>>>> void * scm_with_guile (void *(*func)(void *), void *data) [C Function]
>>> There are special commands in Texinfo to support functions,
>>> indeed, but here the case is different.
>>> I may "cheat" with Texinfo and let it think that "return" is
>>> the return type, and the ";" are the arguments:
>> Ideally, Texinfo might be need some changes, but I'm not sure it is being developed.
> yes, it is, but in this case, I don't want to have to wait
> for them to release something for us.
Perhaps something for the future.
> Here is my proposal.
I think it is OK:
I patched what was patchable on 2.5 and checked the PDF. It looks a bit unusual with the extra space before ';', but the semicolon should probably be there, to indicate correct usage.