On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 01:21:07PM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il 24/06/2012 13:12, David Kastrup ha scritto:
> >Federico Bruni<fedelogy@gmai...>  writes:
> >
> >>Il 24/06/2012 12:50, David Kastrup ha scritto:
> >>>git grep -n "index \\\\book"
> >>>Documentation/notation/input.itely:273:@funindex \bookOutputSuffix
> >>>Documentation/notation/input.itely:274:@funindex \bookOutputName
> >>>Documentation/notation/input.itely:346:@funindex \book
> >>>Documentation/notation/input.itely:347:@funindex \bookpart
> >>>Documentation/notation/spacing.itely:1378:@funindex \bookpart
> >>
> >>Thanks, this proves that they are not in the general index, which
> >>requires @cindex.
> >
> >Hm?
> >
>
> I don't know texinfo at all, I guessed it from here:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/syntax-survey#indexing
>
> But now I think that a @funindex creates an entry also in the
> general index, not only in the command index.
>
> >>So my original request makes sense.
> >>
> >>@funindex should create an item in the command index, right?
> >>Why I can't see \book and \bookpart there?  A bug or what?
> >
> >More likely because you are looking under "B" rather than "\".
> >
>
> That's it!
> Not straightforward.. I can see that there's an open issue:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=855

I've added a link to that tracker, Federico, pointing to your post
that started this thread.

Thanks for the report.

As far as I can tell there is no new bug here.

Cheers,
Colin.

--

Colin Hall

_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu....
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond