. TOMOYO added one new symbol but didn't change existing symbols.
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> In this case, the cplus kernel can accommodate TOMOYO 1.x. Can you
> think of any reason it cannot? Anything else to consider?
Does the cplus kernel accept source code not within RHEL's kernel SRPM?
I thought the cplus kenrel does not. If it doesn't, TOMOYO 2.2 is OK for now
but will require build fix patch when RCU path walk patchset is backported.
> On a not so important subject, is TOMOYO written as 友代, and AKARI as 明 ? 灯り ?