Interesting. Thanks for satisfying my curiosity there. :)

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Sandra Clark <sclarklists@gmai...> wrote:
>
> Pretty much.  To them, XML equals a fusebox like approach and they want to
> get away from FB.  Which is a shame, cause I'm very comfortable with MG
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raymond Camden [mailto:raymondcamden@gmai...]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 9:13 AM
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: The age old Question. Which framework
>
>
> I'll ditto the FW/1 recommendation, but I'm curious about why XML makes
> Model-Glue not an option? The powers that be don't like XML?
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Sandra Clark <sclarklists@gmai...> wrote:
>>
>> So I'm on a new contract and part of the contract requirements is
>> converting an old fusebox (procedural) app to a newer framework.  I've
>> mostly been doing Model-Glue in past few years, but because of the XML
>> setup, it doesn't seem to be an option here.
>>
>
>
>
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:351959
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm