On 14 March 2011 21:56, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kern...> wrote:
> Hi Andrew!
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes
> <ahughes@redh...> wrote:
>> Thanks for catching this bug.  I was going to approve it but you seem to have already committed
>> it -- why???
>
> I thought that'd be OK since the fix was pretty simple and I was able
> to work out why the regression was there. Would you prefer that I wait
> for an explicit ACKs in the future?
>

Please just make it clear what you're asking for.  If it's a fix
you're sure about, then just post to the patches
list with the FYI: subject prefix and commit straight away.  If not,
prefix the subject with RFC: and wait
for feedback.

With this one, it was unclear whether you wanted feedback or not and
the commit wasn't immediate,
but delayed by two days.

http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/docs/cp-hacking.html#SEC11 might
be helpful.

>                        Pekka
>
>



--
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8