opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

c : conlawprof@lists.ucla.edu 13 July 2011 • 4:25AM -0400

Conference on the Constitutional Convention
by Jon Roland

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    Conference on the Constitutional Convention<br>
    September 24-25, 2011, Harvard University<br>
    <br>
    From the <a href="http://conconcon.org">http://conconcon.org</a>
    website:<br>
    <br>
    On September 24th, people from across America and across the
    political spectrum will convene at Harvard University to discuss the
    advisability and feasibility of organizing towards a Constitutional
    Convention. While the conference's lead organizers are proponents of
    a convention—and are particularly passionate about the need to
    reduce the influence of private money in politics—we actively
    encourage the participation of those who support a convention for
    other reasons, and those who oppose holding a convention at all.<br>
    <hr size="2" width="100%">I am not necessarily opposed to holding an
    Article V convention, provided that it meet with specific proposals
    already prepared by groups of those most able to draft
    constitutional amendments of the kind I could approve. It would be a
    waste to convene a bunch of people and expect them to develop
    amendments from scratch during the event. Such a convention would
    not  be composed of experts in constitutional design. The most like
    participants would be the same kind of people who attend Republican
    and Democratic national conventions, who have trouble agreeing on a
    platform or agenda, much less on something as far-reaching as
    constitutional amendments. Those require years of deep discussion
    and debate. I also doubt that Congress will call such a convention
    unless it knows in advance what it will consider.<br>
    <br>
    However, this September 24-25 conference could be useful to organize
    the working groups to develop amendment proposals. Two days is not
    enough time to develop actual proposals, but we could get the people
    together that might do that, and get them started in the right
    direction.<br>
    <br>
    I estimate there are only about 200 people alive with the necessary
    skills and disposition to do it right. I would like to have it
    proved this is an underestimate.<br>
    <br>
    I have a website that can support discussion and work on this, <a
      href="http://amend-it.org">http://amend-it.org</a> , where I have
    some proposals already, mainly those developed by Randy Barnett and
    by me, independently. Randy has tried to develop proposals that he
    hopes would have broad effect, while I have focused more on
    proposals that would overturn specific precedents. <br>
    <br>
    For your amusement, here is what Scott Adams, the creator of
    Dilbert, <a
href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704101604576247143383496656.html">has
      to say</a> on the subject, from his college experience:<br>
    <blockquote>The dean required that our first order of business in
      the fall would be creating a dorm constitution and getting it
      ratified. That sounded like a nightmare to organize. To save time,
      I wrote the constitution over the summer and didn't mention it
      when classes resumed. We held a constitutional convention to
      collect everyone's input, and I listened to two hours of diverse
      opinions. At the end of the meeting I volunteered to take on the
      daunting task of crafting a document that reflected all of the
      varied and sometimes conflicting opinions that had been aired. I
      waited a week, made copies of the document that I had written over
      the summer, presented it to the dorm as their own ideas and
      watched it get approved in a landslide vote. That was the year I
      learned everything I know about getting buy-in.<br>
    </blockquote>
    That is about the only way an Article V convention might work.<br>
    <br>
    I would also prefer such conferences be held at a more neutral
    location, like <a
      href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/seminars/default.asp">Hillsdale
      College</a> or the <a href="http://www.cato.org/projects.php">Cato
      Institute</a>, so it wouldn't be dominated by rent-seeking
    statists.<br>
    <br>
    <a
      href="https://secure.piryx.com/donate/1peoDn6o/Constitution-Society/"><img
        src="cid:part1.02080702.01050704@cons..." alt="Donate
        Now!"></a>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- Jon

----------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society               <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://constitution.org">http://constitution.org</a>
2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322           twitter.com/lex_rex
Austin, TX 78757 512/299-5001  <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jon.roland@cons...">jon.roland@cons...</a>
----------------------------------------------------------</pre>
  </body>
</html>

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.