Certain types of oppressive relationships -- even if eagerly entered into --
should not be legal. I recall the German case where a contract to be eaten
alive, although willingly entered into, was not recognized as excusing the
cannibal. What is polygamous marriage except a contract to be oppressed?
As Marci Hamilton has noticed and anyone who has observed such "marriages"
in the U.S. (remember Manson?) or overseas (Bin Laden) knows -- polygamous
marriages are cannibalism of the soul, through which many women are consumed
for the gratification of one man. It is very hard to imagine anyone
entering into such a relationship who is compos mentis and not subject to
some form of coercion, but even if this were to occur, polygamous marriage
would still amount to a contract to be subjugated. Conventional marriage
MAY be oppressive, but polygamous marriage MUST be oppressive. How could it
be otherwise?
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Frank Cross <
crossf@mail...> wrote:
>
> I don't think the issue is being pro-polygamy. It is about the personal
> choice of a woman to enter such a relationship. There was considerable
> evidence, for a time at least, that divorce was very bad for women. But we
> did not ban divorce (and that often was not even the woman's choice).
>
> At 05:19 PM 7/13/2011,
hamilton02@aol.... wrote:
>
>> I am curious if anyone on this list other than myself has ever met a woman
>> who was in a polygamous marriage. Sandy's nonchalant and pollyanna attitude
>> toward polygamy as though it is simply the latest household timesaver is
>> shocking to me. Polygamy in the US is not a 60s free love commune formed
>> by a bunch of college-educated hippies seeking utopia or a babysitting club.
>> It requires one man to be the equal of multiple women. So each woman is a
>> percentage of 1. And it more often than not guarantees the women will not
>> be well educated. Which mom is going to be the one who does the housework
>> and babycare so the other mom can go to college or law school or grad
>> school? Which one gets to be the slave while the others fulfill their
>> potential? There are always rules about pecking order--first wife is most
>> supported or last wife is most supported. This is a historical and
>> worldwide phenomenon-- it is a fact that it is a construct that denigrates
>> women's equality and child!
>> ren's full potential in the vast majority of instances. Re-read
>> Reynolds--it describes polygamy as a practice that leads to oppressive
>> patriarchical rule. That tendency remains.
>>
>> Marci
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> To post, send message to
Conlawprof@list...
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
>>
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/**mailman/listinfo/conlawprof<
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof>
>>
>> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
>> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
>> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
>> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>>
>
> Frank B. Cross
> Herbert D. Kelleher Centennial Professor of Business Law
> McCombs School of Business
> University of Texas
> CBA 5.202 (B6500)
> Austin, TX 78712-0212
> 512.471.5250
> ______________________________**_________________
> To post, send message to
Conlawprof@list...
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
>
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/**mailman/listinfo/conlawprof<
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof>
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
--
M.N.S. Sellers
Regents Professor
University System of Maryland
Director
Center for International and Comparative Law
University of Baltimore
1420 North Charles Street
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201-5779
telephone: (+1) 410-837-4650
http://law.ubalt.edu/template.cfm?page=680
opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.