opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

c : cwe-lug@lists.firepipe.net 22 February 2007 • 9:17AM -0500

Re: [cwe-lug] single vs multi-line sources.list entries
by Scott Granneman

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




well, single line is easier to read, copy, & manage, imho.

that's what i use.

scott

Robert Citek wrote:
> Is there any advantage/disadvantage to having repository components in
> one line or several lines in a sources.list file?
>
> As far as I can tell, this single line:
>
> deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ dapper main restricted universe
> multiverse
>
> is equivalent to these:
>
> deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ dapper main
> deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ dapper restricted
> deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ dapper universe
> deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ dapper multiverse
>
> When I use either the single-line or multiple-line version I get the
> same result, which I expected from reading the man page.  But is there
> anything I should watch out for?
>
> Regards,
> - Robert
>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> CWE-LUG mailing list
> CWE-LUG@list...
> http://www.cwelug.org/
> http://www.cwelug.org/archives/
> http://www.cwelug.org/mailinglist/

--
R. Scott Granneman
scott@gran... ~ www.granneman.com
Full list of publications @ http://www.granneman.com/publications
   My new book: Linux Phrasebook @ http://www.granneman.com/books
   Read the Download Squad Blog @ http://www.downloadsquad.com

"My life has no purpose, no direction, no aim, no meaning, and yet I'm
happy. I can't figure it out. What am I doing right?"
       ---Charles M. Schulz

_______________________________________________
CWE-LUG mailing list
CWE-LUG@list...
http://www.cwelug.org/
http://www.cwelug.org/archives/
http://www.cwelug.org/mailinglist/

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.