opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

c : cyrus-devel@lists.andrew.cmu.edu 16 July 2012 • 3:23PM -0400

Re: linking with libtool and link_all_deplibs
by Дилян Палаузов

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




Hello,

I reverted the change.  On my system (libtool 2.4.2) link_all_deplibs
was yes.

Със здраве
   Дилян

On 16.07.2012 02:30, Greg Banks wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I reverted the changes causing the warnings with static in the header
>> files.
>>
>> The linking problem, Bron mentioned on 12.07., was is caused by
>> (./libtool --config)'s link_all_deplibs=no .
>>
>> Does anybody have an idea, when is link_all_deplibs set to no, and when
>> to yes/unknown?
>
> On my machine it's set in configure
>
>   8957   link_all_deplibs=unknown
> ...
>   8980   case $host_os in
> ...
>   8996   linux* | k*bsd*-gnu)
>   8997     link_all_deplibs=no
>   8998     ;;
>   8999   esac
>
> This is with autoconf 2.67, automake 1.11.1 libtool 2.2.6b.
>
> Looking at the configure code, it's set to 'yes' on those platforms
> where the dynamic linker is incapable of, or due to bugs intermittently
> capable of, transitively following library dependencies on other
> libraries at program link time.  In other words, the correct value for
> all Linux variants is 'no'.
>


Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.