On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Given the high rate of people (at least in those that replied here)
> in favor of adding submitter in the loop of nnnn@b.d.o, I think your
> plan is very good:
>
> - include the submitter in nnnn@b.d.o by default now;
Considering the fact that this thread has only been here for a few
hours,[1] I'm going to hold off at least for a few days to entertain
objections. But hearing none, I'll implement this when I get a chance.
Don Armstrong
1: Not to mention the multiple messages erroneously describing my
position on the matter without allowing time for a response, or
bothering to read the logs of the relevant bugs.
--
There is no more concentrated form of evil
than apathy.
