On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 18:25 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> That is the thread at large. Currently it was about why nnn-quiet is no
> suitable workaround if the followup address for users (nnn@) would suddenly
> also mail users.
Speaking of -quiet, I'd be happy to see that die. Or at the very least,
-submitter needs to stop setting reply-to to -quiet.