opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

d : debian-devel@lists.debian.org 15 September 2009 • 9:36PM -0400

Re: responsibility for iptables bug
by Lars Bahner

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




2009/9/15 Marco d'Itri <md@linu...>:
> On Sep 14, jidanni@jida... wrote:
>
>> LB> You could file this a a wishlist bug report against the iptables
>> LB> package, and see if the  maintainer wish to add this file (or a larger
>> LB> /etc/sysctl.d/iptables.conf with some sane defaults).
> What makes you believe that the kernel defaults are not sane?
> This is an extra feature which is not required by most people, has a
> computational and memory cost and should not be enabled unless needed.

Prey tell, what is wrong with maintainers of for example iptables,
providing a conffile
with samples (which may even be commented out) which they can
reference to in their documentation, where they comment on the
different settings?

This is what we do with /etc/sysctl.conf today. And I still think a
wishlist bug against iptables is appropriate and would have helped
Jidanni, had it existed.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@list...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@list...


Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.