> > What happens when you want to update object's sitegroup and you set sitegroup
> > property with some value and call update method? Internal UPDATE_REPLIGARD
> > macro is used then, after object's record was successfully updated.
> > But the problem is that this macro is not sitegroup aware!
> Do we need this functionality? I mean moving objects from sitegroup to
> another is not something you do regularly. Only allowing sitegroup
> changes through the specific setsitegroup method sounds safer to me.
Yes, but I asked about this many many months ago and answer was to set
sitegroup with typical property value change, so it is done like this.
But indeed some particular method should be implemented as we must
change all other object's ( like parameter or attachment ) sitegroup.