-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3873/#review5062
-----------------------------------------------------------
trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/actions/actions_container.js
<
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3873/#comment11101>
Nothing in particular, just making it easier to read for me while fixing the array errors.
- Henry
On 2012-02-12 01:46:58, Henry Saputra wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3873/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2012-02-12 01:46:58)
>
>
> Review request for shindig.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> Some of the iterations in the actions_container.js file are using "in" operator without calling hasOwnProperty to make sure its not going up to prototype chain (
http://yuiblog.com/blog/2006/09/26/for-in-intrigue/). It causes trouble when executing in some browsers like FF5.
>
> Small cleanup for actual array to just simply used for-loop with index.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/actions/actions_container.js 1243090
>
> Diff:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3873/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Pass JS unit tests and manual test with common container and action container.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Henry
>
>
opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.