As I stated before, I believe there is something wrong communication between sqlbox and smsbox (using the latest snapshot). This problem not occurs if we use the version right before meta-data introduced.



On May 7, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Rene Kluwen wrote:

> What happens if you remove sqlbox out of the chain?
>  
> == Rene
>  
> From: devel-bounces@kann... [mailto:devel-bounces@kann...] On Behalf Of Willy Mularto
> Sent: Monday, 07 May, 2012 10:10
> To: users@kannel org; kannel_dev_mailinglist devel@kann...
> Subject: Re: test result on http smsc
>  
> Hi again,
> After tracing out I found that bearerbox and sqlbox has no problem receiving the MO, I re test 10000 MO and I can see sqlbox received all, but smsbox didn't receive all requests. I guess there is something between sqlbox and smsbox in communicating the traffics.
>  
>  
> On May 7, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Willy Mularto wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> After a long time not playing with Kannel, today I just finished a simple HTTP SMSC test set, sent 1000 requests (MO) but Kannel built in HTTP SMSC (just downloaded the latests snapshot source and compile) only receive 487. This inconsistence MO receiver bug still exist since meta_data introduced. Any developer aware of this issue? My Kannel runs with bearerbox-sqlbox-smsbox scenario. Thanks.
>  
>  
>  
> Willy Mularto
> F300HD+MR18DE (NLC1725)
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>
>
>  
>  
> Willy Mularto
> F300HD+MR18DE (NLC1725)
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>
>
>  

Willy Mularto
F300HD+MR18DE (NLC1725)