On 01/08/2010 04:32 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> It sounds like we should tell the Fedora Project Board that we are
> forming, and appoint someone to send them regular status reports. We
> should also tell the Packaging Committee that we have identified some
> problems with the current Lisp packaging guidelines and plan to submit
> revisions to those guidelines.
So according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Defining_projects it's
our turn to state missions goals now for a CL SIG, right? I've collected
all links mentioned so far at my talk page in the wiki  and suggest
we start off with finding common denominators and stick to the project
definition guide - we shouldn't declare anything premature to the board.
I'll try to contribute as much as possible depending on my spare time.