Once upon a time, MichaĆ Piotrowski <
mkkp4x4@gmai...> said:
> In any case
> #!/usr/bin/env sh
> seems to be more portable solution.
Using env has always been a hack (and overhead, especially on otherwise
short shell scripts).
As for "portable", /bin/sh is as portable as it gets. I doubt there has
been a significanly used Unix-like system since 7th Edition that didn't
have a Bourne-like shell at /bin/sh.
--
Chris Adams <
cmadams@hiwa...>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
--
devel mailing list
devel@list...https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.