opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

d : dnsop@ietf.org 19 April 2012 • 2:52AM -0400

Re: [DNSOP] NTA... the new NAT?
by Jim Reid

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




On 18 Apr 2012, at 19:28, David Conrad wrote:

> If you don't like the policy of your validator operator, change to a  
> validator operator whose policy you agree with (or, better yet, run  
> your own validator -- it is the only way to be sure).  If you are  
> not permitted to do this, you have other issues.

+1

Though you've not explained how someone would be able to find out what  
was the flavour-of-the-month policy of the validator operator they  
were using that day. Assuming the current network's validation policy  
was broken (for some definition of broken) would of course be a wise  
approach. That probably means everyone runs their own validator to  
avoid sucky hotel nets and the like. Which just moves where NTAs get  
(mis)configured.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.