On 2012-05-02 07:02, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> A mention of RFC 3197, and an explicit answer to the questions it
> raises, seems necessary to me.
Will be added in the next revision.
It will be along the lines of "what we're doing is much more simple and
focused". This MIB is about simple read-only counters of which many
servers already provide at least a subset, and for which home-grown
bindings into SNMP agents (using Perl scripts and such) already exist in
various forms. So to some extent we're standardizing existing practice,
which wasn't the case for RFCs 1611 and 1612. And there are already
plans and preliminary code for such a DNS MIB in Bind 10.