On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Joe Abley wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The only suggestion I have heard relating to this draft is that if we supplied custom software to synthesise answers we could avoid the overly-broad SOA RR returned with the NXDOMAIN.
>
> (My personal opinion is that this leads us down a path of needing to develop, publish and support particular software for AS112 servers, presumably on every platform that anybody might imagine using to run an AS112 server, and that this is a non-starter if for no better reason that there is no clear "we", here.)

Nor do I want to comteplate custom-built software if it can be helped.

[]
> Adopt this doc?

Yes, but biased yes.

Or, I can resubmit the IPv6 counterpart to my draft as a prelude to a
stream of such docs to fill-up DNSOP's agenda (or IETF's in general) for
the forseeable future (years) and enumerate countless junk.

Maybe our draft is better after all.

wfms
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop