Yes, David.  Indeed it does.  I didn't even think of that.  That makes much
more sense.

Thanks.

Peter(--;)

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion relating to the specifics of the C# and Managed C++
languages [mailto:DOTNET-CX@DISC...] On Behalf Of David L.
Penton
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 4:38 PM
To: DOTNET-CX@DISC...
Subject: Re: [DOTNET-CX] ADO.NET, Sql2K5 - true hack...

Is there some reason why you can't return an empty resultset in the cases
where there is nothing to return for sets #2 and #3?  That seems like a
better thing to do.

&_david++;

Peter Osucha wrote:
> This seems like a true 'hack'.  Perhaps someone can give me a better
> way to do this.
>
> I have an SQL2K5 sp that returns up to 3 datasets (before telling me
> to not return more than 1 dataset, please let me know of a better way
> to do this! J).  The first dataset is always returned.  Due to the
> arguments used to call the sp, there is a chance that the normal
> 'second' dataset won't be returned, the normal 'third' dataset won't
> be returned, or that neither the normal 'second' nor the normal
> 'third' dataset will be returned.
>
> In order to tell in my C# app which dataset I am working with (I keep
> looking for new datasets with a
>
> 'while ( dr.NextResult ( ) ) {}'
>
> block of code), I am using a 'hack' of adding an extra column to the
> returned dataset ('FromTabel1' or 'FromTable2', etc.) so that I can
> check the datareader.GetOrdinal() to see which dataset I am really
> dealing with.
>
> If I have explained well enough what I am doing, can someone please
> provide me a better way to check a returned dataSet for my purpose?
>
> Peter

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com