On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 18:00 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> I replied to this before but my message didn't get to the list it seems.
>
> On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 14:15 +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > Ross Burton writes:
> >  > As some of you will know, recently I've been working on porting EDS to
> >  > use DBus instead of Bonobo.
> >
> > Nice! I will then have to start working on the DBus to Win32 port
> > again. (Haven't looked at it since February or so. It did seem to work
> > rather well at that time on Win32, but in the meantime there has
> > obviously been lots of changes in DBus.)
> >
> > (Hmm, I guess Evolution will still be using bonobo indirectly through
> > libgnome, gnome-vfs or whatnot, though?)
>
> Absolustely not ... Evolution will still be using bonobo directly to
> talk to EDS.
>
it would be nice to have a comparison of performance of the 2 branches.
That is, can someone write a stress test program and run it through the
CORBA and the DBus branches?
--
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo@nove...>

_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers@list...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers