On 4/18/2012 10:39 AM, rglan wrote:
> At 4:20 PM +0200 18/4/12, Jari Williamsson wrote:
>> I would suggest to wait until 2012B
>
> How does 2011 figure in all this?
>
It comes in between 2010 and 2012. Are you asking whether it's better
than 2010 and/or worse/better than 2012?