opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

f : freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org 11 April 2012 • 12:58AM -0400

Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
by Arnaud Lacombe

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




Hi,

2012/4/9 Alexander Motin <mav@free...>:
> [...]
>
> I have strong feeling that while this test may be interesting for profiling,
> it's own results in first place depend not from how fast scheduler is, but
> from the pipes capacity and other alike things. Can somebody hint me what
> except pipe capacity and context switch to unblocked receiver prevents
> sender from sending all data in batch and then receiver from receiving them
> all in batch? If different OSes have different policies there, I think
> results could be incomparable.
>
Let me disagree on your conclusion. If OS A does a task in X seconds,
and OS B does the same task in Y seconds, if Y > X, then OS B is just
not performing good enough. Internal implementation's difference for
the task can not be waived as an excuse for result's comparability.

- Arnaud
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@free... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@free..."

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.