opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

f : freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 28 May 2012 • 7:48AM -0400

Re: portupgrade ... doesn't
by illoai@gmail.com

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




On 25 May 2012 12:10, Gary Aitken <freebsd@drea...> wrote:
> Has to be something stupid:
>
> 347 /usr/ports#pkg_version -v | grep updating
> p5-XML-Twig-3.39                    <   needs updating (port has 3.40)
>
> 348 /usr/ports#portupgrade -Rv P5-XML-Twig
> --->  Session started at: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:03:54 -0600
> [Exclude up-to-date packages  done]
> ** None has been installed or upgraded.
> --->  Session ended at: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:03:54 -0600 (consumed 00:00:00)
>
> 350 /usr/ports#pkg_info | grep p5-XML-Twig
> p5-XML-Twig-3.39    Process huge XML documents by chunks via a tree
> interface
>
> hints?

Do
pkg_version -vl"<"
&
pkg_version -vIl"<"
give different results?  (note that's an uppercase "i" followed by a
lowercase "L" in case your screen font makes it hard to tell)
I believe portupgrade uses the INDEX-* files to determine, whereas
pkg_version uses the /usr/ports/*/*/distinfo file (unless -I is provided).

--
--
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@free... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@free..."

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.