> answer yourself.
> Sorry but I don;t follow you right there. with 48 disks you would not mirror 24vs24.
if i wasn't clear enough then i would it like that (with UFS), and
assuming disks are named disk0....disk48, and that i have at least one
more disk for system code, often acessed data etc (SSD would be fine),
while these 48 disks store user/whatever data.