opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

f : freebsd-stable@freebsd.org 1 June 2012 • 3:51AM -0400

Re: Why Are You Using FreeBSD?
by Nick Gustas

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




On 5/31/2012 12:52 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> On 5/31/12 6:37 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
>> On 5/31/2012 5:41 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>> Furthermore, when upgrading the CARP Master firewall, we need to plan
>>> with the Project Manager a failover to the CARP Backup firewall.
>>> Yes, I know about pfsync, yes, we use it, no, it doesn't *instantly*
>>> sync sessions for PF.
>> A bit offtopic on this thread, but isn't pfsync designed to do just
>> that? instantly?
>>
>> With instantly I really mean:
>> Communicate every change to the stable table to the other firewall
>> in order to let the stateful connections survive a firewall failover.
>> Obviously, some packets will be lost, but TCP connections should
>> survive, right?
>>
>> I am not arguing, I ask.
>>
>> Nikos
> Updates aren't instantaneous, they're sent in bundles.
>
> This means that when you failover, you lose the connections that have
> completed a SYN/SYNACK/ACK sequence on your main firewall but which
> aren't synched on your backup.
>
> These connections will continue with the peer sending regular non-syn
> packets, which your backup-now-master PF will drop.
>
>
> On topic, if anyone has an awesome idea around this, I'm all ears, this
> exact topic is causing us some level of discomfort at work, when we need
> to swap firewalls for updates.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@free... mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@free..."
I don't see this option on FreeBSD 9, but on OpenBSD pfsync has a defer
flag that would appear to address your issue.

      The options are as follows:

      defer   Defer transmission of the first packet in a state until a peer
              has acknowledged that the associated state has been inserted.
              See pfsync(4) for more information.

      -defer  Do not defer the first packet in a state.  This is the
default.


From pfsync(4)

      The pfsync interface will attempt to collapse multiple state
updates into
      a single packet where possible.  The maximum number of times a single
      state can be updated before a pfsync packet will be sent out is con-
      trolled by the maxupd parameter to ifconfig (see ifconfig(8) and
the ex-
      ample below for more details).  The sending out of a pfsync packet
will
      be delayed by a maximum of one second.

      Where more than one firewall might actively handle packets, e.g. with
      certain ospfd(8), bgpd(8) or carp(4) configurations, it is
beneficial to
      defer transmission of the initial packet of a connection.  The pfsync
      state insert message is sent immediately; the packet is queued
until ei-
      ther this message is acknowledged by another system, or a timeout
has ex-
      pired.  This behaviour is enabled with the defer parameter to
      ifconfig(8).



I'm sure this could be ported over.

-Nick






_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@free... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@free..."

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.