opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

f : freebsd-stable@freebsd.org 8 August 2012 • 11:21PM -0400

Re: lock violation in unionfs (9.0-STABLE r230270)
by Harald Schmalzbauer

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




schrieb Pavel Polyakov am 06.03.2012 11:20 (localtime):
>>> mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr /mnt
>>>
>>> insmntque: mp-safe fs and non-locked vp: 0xfffffe01d96704f0 is not
>>> exclusive locked but should be
>>> KDB: enter: lock violation
>>
>> Pavel,
>> can you give a spin to this patch?:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/unionfs_missing_insmntque_lock.patch
>>
>> I think that the unlocking is due at that point as the vnode lock can
>> be switch later on.
>>
>> Let me know what you think about it and what the test does.
>
> Thanks!
> This patch fixes the problem with lock violation. Sorry I've tested it so
> late.

Hello,

this patch still applies cleanly to RELENG_9_1. Was there another fix
for the issue or has it just not been PR-sent and thus forgotten?

Thanks,

-Harry


Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.