On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@netb...> wrote:

> I upgraded from 3.2.3 to 3.2.5, and it seems I do not need the patches I
> crafted from 3.3git in order to compute the inode from gfid, they were
> included in 3.2.5 right?
>
> With my previous patches, the inode was just the lower 64 bits of gfid.
> It seems they are now quite different, here is an example:
> inode: 3e21070d0345489e
> gfid: e7 c1 28 40 d7 08 4c e6 9f 10 83 86 81 a2 a4 4f
>
> Is this something I should care about, or is it normal behavior?
>
>
You need not worry as long as the numbers are stable.

Avati