opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

g : groff@gnu.org 27 August 2007 • 1:32PM -0400

Re: [Groff] gkurz, a short introduction for german users
by Michael(tm) Smith

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




Bruno Haible <bruno@clis...>, 2007-08-27 00:08 +0200:

> - At many places you put a hyphen ('-', yields '‐') where a hyphen-minus
>   sign ('\-', yields '-') would be more appropriate. Especially in
>   command-line options. The hyphens not only look strange in command-line
>   options, they also don't work:

Forgive me for poking my nose in here, but I wanted to ask about
that particular problem in order to make sure I have the DocBook
manpages stylesheet doing what it should.

So, to be clear, is the following description correct?

If you put a U+002D HYPHEN-MINUS character into the source for a
groff file, in certain environments (e.g., in a UTF-8
environment), it will get output as a U+2010 HYPHEN character.

And, by the way, if the above is correct, is there a documented
rationale for why groff outputs a U+2010 for it instead of a
U+002D? (Some Unicode recommendation?)

  --Mike

--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
http://sideshowbarker.net/

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.