opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

g : gs-devel@ghostscript.com 19 November 2009 • 4:37PM -0500

Re: [gs-devel] Proposal for changing semantics of gx_font_stack_item_t::index (bug #690834)
by Ken Sharp

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP






>Each member of fstack.items[0.. fstack.depth-1].font is a composite
>font and its descendant fonts can be accessed by described above.  But
>contents of FDepVector are references to another gs_font objects.
>'fstack' is an array describing a single path of fonts those ware
>selected to 'show' current glyph.  gs_type0_next_char_glyph() is
>called for each glyph to know if selected descendant font path has
>been changed for next glyph.

Ah, that makes more sense now, thanks for the explanation.

             Ken

_______________________________________________
gs-devel mailing list
gs-devel@ghos...
http://www.ghostscript.com/mailman/listinfo/gs-devel

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.