On 12-07-08 4:32 AM, Andrew Michael Levin wrote:
> Yes, but you said "this is not strictly speaking necessary," so I
> was asking what the alternative way is.
Ah, I see. The point I was trying to make is that the step is
optional. It is not required to perform the revert, but it does make
it easier in the future if you go back to look at exactly what was done.
Dreampossible: Better software. Simply. http://www.dreampossible.ca Consulting * Mentoring * Training in
C/C++ * OOD * SW Development & Practices * Version Management