it seems, Xerces folks are busy :) I couldn't get a response to this
question, since 4 days now (with a 2 day weekend in between) :) I am
hoping, a yes or no to this idea.
A no would be ok, with justifications, please.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmai...> wrote:
> Apart from the points I mentioned, in the first post; regarding the
> above point, we might make the XPath 2.0 subset (which is currently
> available in Xerces-J) as a default option to users, and the full
> XPath 2.0 processing, with PsychoPath selectable by user's via a
> system property. Or should we make the defaults opposite?
> We use this approach with assertions processing as well, where the
> PsychoPath engine is default. The user's have option to select another
> XPath 2.0 engine via the system property.
> Any thoughts please about this, and the other points I mentioned earlier?
> If these approaches add value to Xerces-J implementation, I'll be
> happy to put effort on this (if I am allowed to :)).