opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

j : jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net 5 March 2011 • 5:04AM -0500

Re: [Jfs-discussion] [ANNOUNCE] jfsutils-1.1.15
by Sandon Van Ness

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




Does this finally fix that logredo fail on a FS with >10 TB used on it?

On 03/04/2011 12:10 PM, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> It's been almost two years, but I finally released jfsutils-1.1.15
> today.  This will be my last release as an IBMer.  I will be joining
> Oracle later this month, continuing to work on Linux, and maintaining
> JFS in my spare time.  In the future, please use my kernel.org address.
>
> This release fixes a few bugs, most of them having to do with several
> terabyte filesystems.
>
> The source tarball can be found at:
> http://jfs.sourceforge.net/project/pub/jfsutils-1.1.15.tar.gz
>
> For more details about JFS, please see our website:
> http://jfs.sourceforge.net
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
> This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details
> its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative
> solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Jfs-discussion mailing list
> Jfs-discussion@list...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details
its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative
solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
Jfs-discussion@list...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.