On 04/22/2011 02:55 AM, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
> It didn't appear to be fixed on my machine so I am guessing the same
> will be for you but definitely curious to here what happens.

Are you sure you tested the patch?  The fsck output indicates that
fsck.jfs was built on March 4, but I sent the patch on March 7.

>> On Apr 20, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/20/2011 07:50 AM, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
>>>> fsck.jfs version 1.1.15, 04-Mar-2011
>>> This doesn't look like it was built with my patch, which I sent on
>>> March 7.
>>>
>>>> processing started: 4/19/2011 22:04:25
>>>> The current device is: /dev/sdd1
>>>> Block size in bytes: 4096
>>>> Filesystem size in blocks: 8718748407
>>>> **Phase 0 - Replay Journal Log
>>>> logredo failed (rc=-220). fsck continuing.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise
Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been
demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE
containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain
from the move. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
Jfs-discussion@list...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion