On 04/22/2011 02:55 AM, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
> It didn't appear to be fixed on my machine so I am guessing the same
> will be for you but definitely curious to here what happens.
Are you sure you tested the patch? The fsck output indicates that
fsck.jfs was built on March 4, but I sent the patch on March 7.
>> On Apr 20, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>>> On 04/20/2011 07:50 AM, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
>>>> fsck.jfs version 1.1.15, 04-Mar-2011
>>> This doesn't look like it was built with my patch, which I sent on
>>> March 7.
>>>> processing started: 4/19/2011 22:04:25
>>>> The current device is: /dev/sdd1
>>>> Block size in bytes: 4096
>>>> Filesystem size in blocks: 8718748407
>>>> **Phase 0 - Replay Journal Log
>>>> logredo failed (rc=-220). fsck continuing.