On 04/22/2011 04:57 AM, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 02:55 AM, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
>> It didn't appear to be fixed on my machine so I am guessing the same
>> will be for you but definitely curious to here what happens.
>
> Are you sure you tested the patch?  The fsck output indicates that
> fsck.jfs was built on March 4, but I sent the patch on March 7.
>

Pretty darn sure. That date is *not* the compile date but instead just
the date that is listed in the source:

./include/jfs_version.h:#define JFSUTILS_DATE "04-Mar-2011"

I verified my source had the patch and my binary modification time shows
1 minute after the edit time of the file from the patch:

root@dekabutsu: 05:07 AM :~/jfsutils-1.1.15# ls -lsah ./libfs/log_map.c
60K -rw-r--r-- 1 root 1000 57K 2011-03-16 07:50 ./libfs/log_map.c
root@dekabutsu: 05:07 AM :~/jfsutils-1.1.15# ls -lsah /sbin/fsck.jfs
1000K -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 996K 2011-03-16 07:51 /sbin/fsck.jfs
root@dekabutsu: 05:07 AM :~/jfsutils-1.1.15#

so I would have to say yes, I am about 98% sure that I did have the
patch applied properly.