On 04/22/2011 04:57 AM, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 02:55 AM, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
>> It didn't appear to be fixed on my machine so I am guessing the same
>> will be for you but definitely curious to here what happens.
> Are you sure you tested the patch? The fsck output indicates that
> fsck.jfs was built on March 4, but I sent the patch on March 7.
Pretty darn sure. That date is *not* the compile date but instead just
the date that is listed in the source: