> As an application developer, I'm totally fine with the packaged
> plugin approach, if distributions will package it. I can live both
> with the extra call and the extra memory requirement -- and I
> totally understand not wanting to burden every user of lcms2 with
> the memory requirement.
The memory requirement described for the tables is trivial compared to
the amount of memory required to perform other operations.
I worry that plugins are more complex and pose more security issues.