On Thu, 31 May 2012, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:

> As an application developer, I'm totally fine with the packaged
> plugin approach, if distributions will package it. I can live both
> with the extra call and the extra memory requirement -- and I
> totally understand not wanting to burden every user of lcms2 with
> the memory requirement.

The memory requirement described for the tables is trivial compared to
the amount of memory required to perform other operations.

I worry that plugins are more complex and pose more security issues.

Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simp..., http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Lcms-user mailing list
Lcms-user@list...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user