On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:50:48PM +0100, Ralf Baechle DL5RB wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:04:17PM +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> > Can anybody remember, why AX.25 interfaces in Linux kernel are
> > enforced to have IP addresses by tools such as KISSATTACH ?
>
> A while ago I was curious myself for why that is needed and dug into
> the CVS history.  I found the IP address wasn't always enforced and the
> commit message didn't really explain why the change was needed.
>
> 73 de DL5RB op Ralf

I figured it eventually myself, and rewrote  libax25's
axconfig/rsconfig/nrconfig functions to not to require IP addresses
in AX.25/Netrom/Rose interfaces to be able to find all interface
currently defined.

> ---
> DL5RB / M0LRB / AB1IN
> Loc.    JN47BS / CQ 14 / ITU 28 / DOK A21
> Packet: DL5RB@DB0FHN.#BAY.DEU.EU

73 de Matti, OH2MQK
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger...
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html