On Wednesday 31 December 2008 11:53, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 Dec 2008 11:05:27 am jtd wrote:
> > According to the press (TOI) Satyam's maintanence of UNs network
> > was pathetic with several cases of network compromises. Satyam is
> > a M$ most valued (whatever) partner. Hmmm... nothing to do with
> > the os i think.
> speaking of Satyam and ethics, where does this fit in:
Only the training part is sort of ok. St. Johns provides a far more
comprehensive training on first aid and emergency medical help - far
more relevant in a disaster emergency than cardiac failure revival.
The cost is extremely low and the certification is recognised world
However the PGPEC is interesting.
The 108 service backend and the service delivery itself is paid for by
the government and Satyam is a direct beneficiary. Nothing
philanthropic there. Plain business and a good one at that.