opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

l : linuxers@mm.glug-bom.org 3 January 2009 • 1:46PM -0500

Re: [ILUG-BOM] The virtualbox license --- clarification from the FAQ --
by jtd

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




On Friday 02 January 2009 12:59, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Friday 02 Jan 2009 11:56:51 am jtd wrote:
> > 1) does the term commercial appear in the licence
>
> no
>
> > 2) does the licence refer to notice.txt
>
> no
>

God. A mile long thread for nothing. Qt is GPL then. And One can use
it in gpl commercial software. And trolltech continues to plug a
completely wrong interpretation of both the terms commercial and GPL.

--
Rgds
JTD
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.