On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:22:15PM +0000, Mark Skilbeck wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 05:49:14AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > However, the change is incomplete - it works for the case where the
> > user types 'j' followed by the jump tag, but it does not handle the
> > case where the user selects the tag from the jump-page.
> Yeah. I don't see how we can account for that use-case. There isn't any special
> code for viewing the jumps file (AFAIK), so it would be impossible to hook-into.