Murray S. Kucherawy writes:

> I don't have a reality suspension field in effect on this topic.  I
> was simply disputing the claim that complying with the
> List-Unsubscribe RFC constitutes "hiding" of those details.

It's not deliberate, let alone malicious, but it does conceal the
details from the user's view, both in current practice (where few MUAs
-- at least weighted by user count -- implement reasonable handling of
those headers) and in reasonable implementations of the RFC (as in the
part of my post that you snipped).

> I don't claim MLMs are broken in this regard, but I do think some
> more modern thinking by all components is in order.

I agree, and have no objection to advocacy, or to RFCs that take
advantage of more modern thinking.  But that's very different from
arguing that a defect in the DKIM RFC is really a problem of the
implementations.


_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@pyth...
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/subscriber%40opensubscriber.com

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9