> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark.com@pyth... > [mailto:mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark.com@pyth...] On
> Behalf Of Richard Damon
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 7:27 AM
> To: mailman-developers@pyth... > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] New RFC on using DKIM with MLMs
> > Well, I also don't agree with characterizing this as a defect in the
> > DKIM RFC.
> I would consider an RFC that tells some people they need to violate the
> laws of their country to follow it to have a defect.
The RFC doesn't say you have to do that.
What it says is the list should re-sign if it modifies the message (or, in general, re-sign anyway). So append whatever you want, just re-sign the message. Are you insisting that advice is defective?
What it also says is if you want author signatures to survive MLMs, then you have to re-think those practices. But nobody really expects that right now, I think.