> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark.com@pyth...
> [mailto:mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark.com@pyth...] On
> Behalf Of Richard Damon
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 7:27 AM
> To: mailman-developers@pyth...
> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] New RFC on using DKIM with MLMs
>
> > Well, I also don't agree with characterizing this as a defect in the
> > DKIM RFC.
>
> I would consider an RFC that tells some people they need to violate the
> laws of their country to follow it to have a defect.

The RFC doesn't say you have to do that.

What it says is the list should re-sign if it modifies the message (or, in general, re-sign anyway).  So append whatever you want, just re-sign the message.  Are you insisting that advice is defective?

What it also says is if you want author signatures to survive MLMs, then you have to re-think those practices.  But nobody really expects that right now, I think.

_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@pyth...
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/subscriber%40opensubscriber.com

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9