----- Original Message -----
>
> ----- "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@gmai...> wrote:
> >
> > Since the FPL has appointed three of those seats to volunteers and
> > only one to someone who's a Red Hat employee, I'm not sure how this
> > is
> > relevant.  Looking at the Board history for those seats[1] one can
> > see
> > half the appointments since mid-2008 have been volunteers.  Also of
> > note is the fact that half the people elected by the community
> > since
> > that time have also been volunteers.  So the appointments don't
> > look
> > slanted toward Red Hat employees AFAICT, which is just as intended.
> >
> > We can agree to disagree on your overall point, that's fine.  I
> > just
> > wanted to point out the facts don't support an effort to stack the
> > Board with Red Hat people.
> >
> > * * *
> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/History
> >
>
> How about the bigger question, what percentage of FESCo has been Red
> Hat employees during any term.

How many ran for elections and got voted...

> After all it is FESCo that really
> matters what is in Fedora, not the board.

More than to other Fedora bodies as FESCo is engineering committee and
Red Hatters in Fedora are mostly engineers. Makes sense :) You see less
in Board and even less in FAmSCo...

Jaroslav

> I would track this out
> myself but the use of non@redhat email addresses makes it hard, even
> asking the candidates in Election town halls you get the run around
> commonly. "Who I work for doesn't matter." How many times have we
> heard that?
>
> -- Bob
> --
> marketing mailing list
> marketing@list...
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@list...
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing