Thanks for that, but I reject the dialectic for several reasons;

No sense can be made of it (and up to now, no dialecticain has been able to
show he or she can make sense of it).

It is a card-carrying example of ruling-class thought, imported into Marxism
from mystical Hermeticism.

We do not need it -- in fact it clouds otherwise clear ideas contained in
Historical Materialism.

It helps foster sectarianism in Marxism, leading to its increasing impotence
in the class-struggle.

Now you might find all of these hard to swallow, but that is why I set up my
site to prove them true to the best of my ability.

Of course, you can ignore all I have to say, but you should not send me
e-mails criticising me without at least reading what I have to say  --  
should you?

RL

----- Original Message -----
From: <Dogangoecmen@aol....>
To: <marxism-thaxis@list...>
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] People's History of Science


> dear rose,
>
> you are right in saying that class struggle pre-dated hegel. but it did
> not
> pre-dated dialectic. i think you and many firends from the list who defend
> dialectic forget about the fact that dialectic is not something you can
> construct voluntarily. you seem to have a very narrow concept of dilectic
> since  you
> reduce it to hegelian version. but remember what engels said: unlike hegel
> he
> and marx want to discover dilecting in things in question - aolsin class
> struggle.
> _______________________________________________
> Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
> Marxism-Thaxis@list...
> To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
> http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
>



_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@list...
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis