opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

m : mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com 7 August 2009 • 1:23AM -0400

Re: [Mimedefang] Strange issue with mimedefang/spamassassin reports.
by Champ Clark III [Softwink]

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 10:26:53AM -0400, Champ Clark III [Softwink] wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 10:19:08AM -0400, Ron Wilhoite wrote:
> > On 06/03/2009 09:23 AM Champ Clark III [Softwink] wrote:
> >> I've been running SA/MD for quite a while and love it.  Over
> >> the last 6 months or so,  I've run into a strange problem.  I believe
> >> it's primarily happening on one of our mail servers.  I've set MD to send
> >> all spam to a spam address.  Like thus:
> >> # Send to spam address
> >> add_recipient('spam@localhost');
> >> }
> >> This seems to work just fine.  However,  from time to time,
> >> SA/MD will send a "report" of spam to the user and not send it to the
> >> 'spam@localhost' e-mail address.    Again,  the majority of the spam
> >> ends up in the 'spam@localhost',   but every now and then I'll get a
> >> e-mail,  with full report that e-mail is spam (scores, etc) in my inbox.

I posted this a while back.  This problem seems to be getting
worse.  To re-explain;  the majority of spam get's sent to
"spam@localhost".  Every now and then,  rather than the spam going to
"spam@localhost",  it'll show up in users mailboxes with full report
that the message is indeed spam.

This started out as a "every now and then" thing,  and has
dramatically increased quite a bit.   Rather than clutter up the list,
I've posted an example of a message that "slips" through.

http://vistech.net/~champ/spam.txt

I've been up and down configuration file and have not seen how
or  why this is happening.   I've upgraded mimedefang,  and the results
are the same.  Any ideas?




--
        Champ Clark III | Softwink, Inc | 800-538-9357 x 101
                     http://www.softwink.com

GPG Key ID: 58A2A58F
Key fingerprint = 7734 2A1C 007D 581E BDF7  6AD5 0F1F 655F 58A2 A58F
If it wasn't for C, we'd be using BASI, PASAL and OBOL.

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.